View Message Board Guidelines
 |
Author |
TOPIC: NO SUCH THING AS "FACE GUARDING". FACTS! |
|
| Commisoner Blunt
May 7, 2012
9:10:43 AM
Entry #: 3910429
| Listes alot of you "vets", including "Fevah" have been playing many years but still dont know football rules. As ive stated at the field there is no such thing as face guarding, or having to look back for the ball. Click the link or just read. And anyone who placed a bet on this rule please make payment on Sunday Thanks
Hahahahahahahaah I think 90% of the league doesnt know normal. commom football rules lmao
And if this isnt good enough proof for you ill pull up more articles and rule books for you lmao
Click here to go to to see the actual site.
The NFL has had its share of controversial calls over the years. Some of them are on misinterpretations of the rules by officials. Others are just rules that are not explained correctly to the public by television broadcasters. Defenders are permitted to interfere with a player's vision, and as long as no other rules are broken it is not a penalty in the National Football League.
Face guarding in the NFL is the act of trying to block the vision of a receiver from being able to see the football when attempting to catch a pass.
Legality
There are rules in the NFL against pass interference, but there are no such rules against face guarding. A defender can block a receiver's view of the ball with any part of his body.
When Face Guarding Becomes Pass Interference
If the defender makes physical contact with a receiver while trying to block his view of the football before the ball arrives, that is considered pass interference. The penalty is for pass interference, not for face guarding.
Controversy
One of the more controversial calls was made in the 2007 AFC Championship Game, when analyst Phil Simms indicated a Patriots defender, Ellis Hobbs, was penalized for face guarding. The NFL later indicated it should not have been a penalty.
Misconceptions
Considering face guarding is not a penalty, a defender does not have to be "looking for the ball" when breaking up a pass for the receiver. Instead, he just needs to make sure he makes no physical contact at all with the receiver before the ball arrives.
#Learn The Rules
#Some of us "play" the game, some of us "KNOW THE GAME"
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
|
|
|
May 7, 2012
9:19:53 AM
Entry #: 3910443
| This is true,last year i did it against the Vikings,wasnt penalized,i never looked back,blocked the pass but never touched the receiver,conclusion,Great play by me for stopping a 6'6 tightend when im 5'7,learn the rules tough guys
|
|
| The Hec #21
May 7, 2012
9:43:39 AM
Entry #: 3910460
| Hello Cash...
we didnt say face guarding we said Pass Inter.
from your own website.
Controversy
One of the more controversial calls was made in the 2007 AFC Championship Game, when analyst Phil Simms indicated a Patriots defender, Ellis Hobbs, was penalized for face guarding. The NFL later indicated it should not have been a penalty.
Misconceptions
Considering face guarding is not a penalty, a defender does not have to be "looking for the ball" when breaking up a pass for the receiver. Instead, he just needs to make sure he makes no physical contact at all with the receiver before the ball arrives.
Read more: NFL Face Guarding Rules | eHow.com http://www.ehow.com/facts_4778957_nfl-rules-face-guarding.html#ixzz1uBu3s7SH
Also video of REAL REFS in training going over the same situation. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PEK5iLh9hOM
Thank you and have a nice day on posting this on my facebook page for site views. you got em and now i wish for my brother to be paid his $100.
|
|
| Comissioner Blunt
May 7, 2012
9:51:01 AM
Entry #: 3910466
| Thats right heck, you are correct, we had a bet that there is no such thing as pass interference, I as the comissioner of the league thought that there was no such rule as pass interference, and i would have a 10 minute argument proclaiming that pass interference is NOT a penalty lol
This makes perfect sense and you are correct, Pass Interference..IS a penalty lol
Im not sure how i forgot that lmao ..good rule hahahahahahaha
"Pass interference" lmao
|
|
| The Hec #21
May 7, 2012
10:23:47 AM
Entry #: 3910506
| and ur switching the words around. We said Pass Interference because the defender did the same exact thing in the youtube video. Which is you cant face shield which is not the proper term, its Defensive Pass Interference. You wish to word play now but YOU know exactly what we meant in the context of what we speak. Knowing you tho, you will never fully admit but keep talking empty rhetoric and fallacious statements to hear yourself talk. Good day sir. See you sunday unfortunately.
|
|
