 |
Author |
TOPIC: Coldwell Bankers |
| dpfc
April 29, 2007
4:21:52 PM
Entry #: 2107094
| You guys played a great game hats off to you. Hope you guys get into the playoffs.
|
| hobbes83
April 29, 2007
6:59:21 PM
Entry #: 2107399
| Was a very good game on both sides, too bad about the ending (not the score). Tainted a well played game from both clubs.
|
| firedawg
April 29, 2007
7:12:23 PM
Entry #: 2107432
| If we had to lose a game, that is a way to lose that I can deal with, except for the way overtime is handled. I expect nothing less than to make the playoffs. I hope we get the opportunity to play DPFC again. Our team may have gotten to a slow start, but regardless, our team is capable of beating any team and plan on being in the playoffs. As for the last 2 minutes, sh%! happens. You deal with it and move on.
|
| hobbes83
April 29, 2007
7:34:23 PM
Entry #: 2107468
| The way the final was decided leaves a lot to be desired. Had Dutch Passion lost the tie breaker or as it was us that did, was just wrong. There were two great efforts from two good clubs, and then only two players get to decide it. That is just wrong.
Dave, please, the tie breaker has to be addressed!!!!
Thanks for the kudos dpfc, hopefully we'll see you guys again.
|
|
| dpfc
April 29, 2007
8:18:10 PM
Entry #: 2107565
| I agree the tie breaker needs to go. They should do a shoot out, or end in a tie and each team gets a point.
|
| xtremeIX
April 30, 2007
6:59:37 AM
Entry #: 2108077
| I also agree the tie breaker needs to go!! The game between Cemex and Rage/Ballers ended on this and I thought it was ridiculous!
|
| jimbo
April 30, 2007
9:32:22 AM
Entry #: 2108457
| My team was also in the shotout and we won. So we are not giving that win back. But i do think we should go back to having ties. Then just use the standard format if there are teams with the exact record go like this. 1. head to head 2. goals allowed. 3. goals for. 4. coin toss.
Thats my thought.
|
|
| badboy4
April 30, 2007
12:44:23 PM
Entry #: 2108932
| what do you guys think of sudden death Penalty shots ?
Maybe this would be a better way to end ties !
|
|
| Cowboy
April 30, 2007
2:35:37 PM
Entry #: 2109200
| That would atleast give both teams a chance.
|
|
| xtremeIX
April 30, 2007
3:18:09 PM
Entry #: 2109326
| I like the Sudden Death penalty shot idea.
|
|
| badboy4
April 30, 2007
10:36:25 PM
Entry #: 2110344
| I know that the shootout tie breaker is new and different but we're stuck with it until after the 8th game. After that if the majority of us want to change the tie breaker than Dave has no problem doing that.
The tie breaker was changed mainly for the amount of time that it was taking on each game, it pushed all the games back. I think the sudden death penalty shot would work best!
|
|
| hobbes83
May 1, 2007
6:12:15 AM
Entry #: 2110656
| 1 hour 15min allotted for each game, yes?
30min halves, with 5min halftime, yes?
Where does the extra 10min go? That could have been used for PK's or at least the sudden death PK's that were voted on in the managers meetings.
Be more consequent with game starting times and games will not run over and the Refs will be able to go home on time as well.
Just a thought.
|
|
| RecStaff
May 1, 2007
1:08:42 PM
Entry #: 2111752
| I wonder where the 10 minutes go too, We are also trying to get stricter about the games starting on time and not waiting for players to dress. That's why we started the "start with two rule."
|
