|
Author |
TOPIC: No SHOOTOUTS |
| Goal digger
April 15, 2007 2:11:19 PM
Entry #: 2073156
| i DON'T THINK THE SHOOTOUT ARE A GOOD IDEA.. AND IT IS NOT FAIR THAT ONLY ONE PLAYER FROM THE ANY TEAM HAS A RIGHT TO SCORE...
ANYONE WITH ME...
CANCELL THE SHOOTOUTS DAVE.. TRY SOMETHING ELSE... GENERAL MEETING ABOUT IT...
|
| Goal digger
April 15, 2007 2:12:16 PM
Entry #: 2073159
| NOT A RIGHT BUT THE CHANCE TO SCORE.. WHAT ABOUT THE BEST OUT OF 3 ...
|
| Xavier
April 15, 2007 5:50:22 PM
Entry #: 2073624
| This shot outs stink. Whose idea was it!!! What about suden dead penalty kiks, that makes more sense. Dave, nobody likes this, just ask around!!!
|
| hobbes83
April 15, 2007 8:37:15 PM
Entry #: 2074008
| exactly, if both "teams" earn the tie, both "teams" should try to break it, not just two people.
|
| RecStaff
April 16, 2007 12:20:59 PM
Entry #: 2075577
| Perhaps you should try it before you get so upset.
We are very flexible, in fact, at least one of the teams that are complaining about this, missed the registration deadline...but you are playing becasue we went out of our way to accomodate you.
We will evaluate this during the first half of the season.
|
| dpfc
April 16, 2007 12:28:16 PM
Entry #: 2075589
| We support you Dave. We like the idea, it also doesn't delay the start of the next game.
|
| J C
April 16, 2007 6:54:54 PM
Entry #: 2076992
| that's two more votes my Men's and Girls team like it.
|
| the joe
April 16, 2007 7:16:14 PM
Entry #: 2077068
| the shoot out idea is not fair and odd. Anyone remember the managers meeting? Whats the point of voting at the managers meeting if we don't go along with it. Sudden death PKs were voted on, anyone remember?
|
| RecStaff
April 17, 2007 11:42:56 AM
Entry #: 2078762
| The referees meeting was right after the manager's meeting. I was not aware until I heard from the refs that the games were running so far behind and that it was effecting the referees, so with that knowledge in hand, we decided to make the adjustment.
|